A Magic The Gathering blog of sorts
magicjunkie:

sarroth:

heroeskage:

the new liliana huh i was expecting somthing good her ultimate isnt even an ultimate maybe this is wizards way to say sorry for jtms nueturing planesalkers all together

She only costs 3, if you use the +1 she’s immediately out of Lightning Bolt / Incinerate range, her abilities protect her, and her final is a Do or Die that affects your opponent’s Planeswalkers, Enchantments, Artifacts, and Lands as well.
I don’t see what’s to complain about here. Ok, so her +1 could affect an opponent instead of you as well, her -2 could “destroy target creature” instead of allowing them to choose what to sacrifice, and her Ultimate could just say “Destroy all permanents target player controls” - any or all of those would make her better (well, except for the first if you like that it is good for multiplayer), but take this to heart: Just because a card can be better doesn’t mean it needs to be. Swords to Plowshares gives the opponent life and affects only creatures, so why not “W: Exile target permanent or spell”? It’s better!
I like the new Liliana. The card’s in-color and follows some of Liliana’s strengths as a spellcaster without seeming stale, it’s strong without being JtMS-y, and it’s a 3 mana ‘walker for a color that tends to get the more expensive ones. And I definitely agree with other commenter’s conclusions that planeswalkers that are not made to go in every single deck of their color is better for diversity in play, not just for Standard but for Commander as well. There is just lots of win here. Kudos, Wizards, kudos.

 I agree that not every planeswalker needs to be designed to blow your mind in order to be effective and useful. Always try your best to think of cards in terms of multiple formats (Constructed/Limited/Casual)

magicjunkie:

sarroth:

heroeskage:

the new liliana huh i was expecting somthing good her ultimate isnt even an ultimate maybe this is wizards way to say sorry for jtms nueturing planesalkers all together

She only costs 3, if you use the +1 she’s immediately out of Lightning Bolt / Incinerate range, her abilities protect her, and her final is a Do or Die that affects your opponent’s Planeswalkers, Enchantments, Artifacts, and Lands as well.

I don’t see what’s to complain about here. Ok, so her +1 could affect an opponent instead of you as well, her -2 could “destroy target creature” instead of allowing them to choose what to sacrifice, and her Ultimate could just say “Destroy all permanents target player controls” - any or all of those would make her better (well, except for the first if you like that it is good for multiplayer), but take this to heart: Just because a card can be better doesn’t mean it needs to be. Swords to Plowshares gives the opponent life and affects only creatures, so why not “W: Exile target permanent or spell”? It’s better!

I like the new Liliana. The card’s in-color and follows some of Liliana’s strengths as a spellcaster without seeming stale, it’s strong without being JtMS-y, and it’s a 3 mana ‘walker for a color that tends to get the more expensive ones. And I definitely agree with other commenter’s conclusions that planeswalkers that are not made to go in every single deck of their color is better for diversity in play, not just for Standard but for Commander as well. There is just lots of win here. Kudos, Wizards, kudos.

 I agree that not every planeswalker needs to be designed to blow your mind in order to be effective and useful. Always try your best to think of cards in terms of multiple formats (Constructed/Limited/Casual)

  1. uroborus-void reblogged this from confessionsofapuzzledwizard and added:
    Every one seems to be over looking the fact that the minimum you could do is take out half your opponents lands! That’s...
  2. bluemanpoop reblogged this from etchdesketch and added:
    It’s not terribly strong but don’t ignore the casting cost. That plays a key role in the card’s power. JTMS wouldn’t...
  3. rodolfofarias reblogged this from slime-prince and added:
    liked her old ability better :
  4. vurma reblogged this from jamestheasian and added:
    earlier today: “Dude, she’s not even that good.”
  5. jamestheasian reblogged this from burnandheal and added:
    Her +1 isn’t actually bad if you have the cards to support it. If you have something in your hand that would play better...
  6. burnandheal reblogged this from magicjunkie
  7. slime-prince reblogged this from magicjunkie and added:
    LOVE LILIANA. I’m
  8. magicjunkie reblogged this from sarroth and added:
    I agree that not every planeswalker needs to be designed to blow your mind in order to be effective and useful. Always...
  9. etchdesketch reblogged this from heroeskage
  10. sarroth reblogged this from heroeskage and added:
    She only costs 3, if you use...+1 she’s immediately out of Lightning Bolt / Incinerate...
  11. tomatoclone reblogged this from confessionsofapuzzledwizard
  12. lordofillusions reblogged this from confessionsofapuzzledwizard and added:
    If that’s so then that’s a pretty worthless ability. I mean, would it not just make more sense to have them not see...
  13. xkataly reblogged this from confessionsofapuzzledwizard and added:
    I don’t think this person realizes that you can make them sac LANDS too with this.
  14. elementnumber46 reblogged this from ashencandy and added:
    I don’t see how this is a “neutered” planeswalker card. +1 - Discard always helps, and if you’re forced to discard your...
  15. ashencandy reblogged this from thehermitic and added:
    I hope her related plot and Garruk are better than this.
  16. biffmccracken reblogged this from confessionsofapuzzledwizard and added:
    This might not fit with what I’m posting for naughty hour but this is sexy to me, so suck it!
  17. thehermitic reblogged this from confessionsofapuzzledwizard and added:
    Even if she didn’t have her fantastic final ability, she’d STILL be more than playable. Her abilities are totally...
  18. heroeskage posted this